The Terrorist Threat

 

Urging Swift Action, Panel Warns Deadlier Attacks are Likely

“The [911] commission chairman, Thomas H. Kean… said an attack “of even greater magnitude” than the one in which terrorists used hijacked airliners to destroy the World Trade Center, blast a hole in the Pentagon and kill about 3,000 people is “possible—even probable. We do not have the luxury of time, Mr. Kean said at a news briefing accompanying release of the book-length report, the product of many months of inquiries and an agonizing self-examination of many units of government….

“The commission’s vice chairman, former Representative Lee H. Hamilton, said military action and heightened security would not be enough. He said the United States must promote an “agenda of opportunity” in impoverished countries, and join “the battle of ideas,” so that those regions do not become incubators of future terrorists.”

~ New York Times

 

“I believe that for the moment the world remains blind to the biggest totalitarianism of the twenty-first century, which is Islamic fundamentalism. Now we must prepare ourselves seriously to face this danger. For me, this totalitarianism is without any shadow of a doubt comparable to Stalinism and Nazism, the biggest scourges of the twentieth century.”

~ Pilar Rahola, Spanish feminist and former parliamentarian


“On September the 11th, 2001, the terrorists left their mark of murder on my country and took the lives of 67 British citizens. With the passing of months and years, it is the natural human desire to resume a quiet life and to put that day behind us as if waking from a dark dream. The hope that danger has passed is comforting, understandable and it is false. The attacks that followed in Bali, Jakarta, Casablanca, Bombay, Mombasa, Najaf, Jerusalem, Riyadh, Baghdad and Istanbul were not dreams. They’re part of a global campaign by terrorist networks to intimidate and demoralize all who oppose them. These terrorists target the innocent and they kill by the thousands. And they would, if they gain the weapons they seek, kill by the millions and not be finished.”

~ George W. Bush in London, November 19, 2003

 

“We are presently engaged in a world war for our civilization and its vision of a just and humane society. Our values will either endure this present struggle and indeed be invigorated by the ordeal, or like once great civilizations of the past we will stumble in the face of barbarism and lose all that we hold dear.”

~ Victor Davis Hanson, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution


“….we have reached a juncture, I think, where people have to agree… about the nature of the threat, or disagree. The threat is the proliferation of the technical knowledge beneath weapons of mass destruction, and the existence of people willing to use these technologies against large civilian populations or whole nations. That, in sum, is terrorism.

“For those of us who agree about the nature of the threat, I think the time has come to recognize, in a formal way, that we have entered a period of history analogous to the Cold War—and that we now need Cold War institutions to win the war on terror.

“We don’t require another mass murder next week in London, and the week after in New York, Madrid or Sydney to understand that this threat will recur for years until it is defeated… A grand struggle is unfolding, and it will need structures outside government to win it… [for] this is a war in which ideas fight alongside men in arms.”

~ Daniel Henninger, Wall Street Journal

 

An American Hiroshima is all too likely.

“If a 10-kiloton nuclear weapon, a midget even smaller than the one that destroyed Hiroshima, exploded in New York's Times Square, the fireball would vaporize or destroy the theater district, Madison Square Garden, the Empire State Building, Grand Central Terminal and Carnegie Hall (along with me and my building).

“The blast would partly destroy a much larger area, including the United Nations. On a weekday some 500,000 people would be killed.

“Could this happen?

“Unfortunately, it could - and many experts believe that such an attack, somewhere, is likely. The Aspen Strategy Group, a bipartisan assortment of policy mavens, focused on nuclear risks at its annual meeting here last week, and the consensus was twofold: The danger of nuclear terrorism is much greater than the public believes, and the U.S. government hasn't done nearly enough to reduce it.…

“William Perry, a former secretary of defense, says there is an even chance of a nuclear terror strike within this decade - that is, in the next six years. ‘We're racing toward unprecedented catastrophe,’ Perry warns. ‘This is preventable, but we're not doing the things that could prevent it.’”

~ Nicholas Kristof, New York Times

 

"The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands. So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world."

~ George W. Bush, Second Inaugural Address

 

“Explosives that used to be difficult to obtain are now a phone call away. Esoteric know-how is posted on Web sites. We can't fight the dispersion of knowledge, but we can stop the dispersion of deadly materials. The errors over Iraq should not obscure the reality that terrorists are seeking chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, and would not hesitate to use them. Counter-proliferation—using bribes, sanctions and even, on occasion, military force—needs to move to the center of foreign policy.

“What drives terrorism, however, is not easy means but strong motives. Militant, political Islam has brainwashed thousands of young Muslims around the world who believe it is their duty to fight against the modern world. This ideology of hatred has grown as the Western-supported "moderate" regimes of the Middle East miserably failed to deliver economic opportunity or political freedom to their people.…

“The Saudi and Pakistani cases show that once you nurture radical ideologies, they become uncontrollable, even to the states that created them. That's why the only way to combat this new global terror is to fight the ideology that fires it everywhere. So the war on terror is really a war of ideas. And I'm not sure we are winning it.”

~ Farid Zacharia, Newsweek Magazine

 

“…unless we partner with Arabs and Muslims to change their context, unless we help them create the free space for a war of ideas that will allow for a new discussion out front and out back, we're just begging for another 9/11.”

~ Thomas Friedman, New York Times

 

< Islamist Agenda

 

Printer Friendly Version of This Page